FS50193785: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
CSV import
 
m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision"
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50193785
|dn_ref=FS50193785
|dn_date=03/11/2009
|dn_date=3 November 2009
|dn_pa=BBC
|dn_pa=BBC
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request for the production costs and estimated viewing figures for the programme �Wanted Down Under�. The BBC argued that the request was for information held for the purposes of art, journalism or literature and was therefore derogated. The Commissioner�s decision is that the BBC correctly determined that the information is held to a significant extent for these purposes and therefore the BBC is not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request for the production costs and estimated viewing figures for the programme ‘Wanted Down Under’. The BBC argued that the request was for information held for the purposes of art, journalism or literature and was therefore derogated. The Commissioner’s decision is that the BBC correctly determined that the information is held to a significant extent for these purposes and therefore the BBC is not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50193785.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50193785.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:37, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50193785
  • Date: 3 November 2009
  • Public Authority: BBC
  • Summary: The complainant made a request for the production costs and estimated viewing figures for the programme ‘Wanted Down Under’. The BBC argued that the request was for information held for the purposes of art, journalism or literature and was therefore derogated. The Commissioner’s decision is that the BBC correctly determined that the information is held to a significant extent for these purposes and therefore the BBC is not obliged to comply with Parts I to V of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]