FS50169424: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:36, 15 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50169424
Date: 8 January 2008
Public Authority: Information Commissioner
Summary: The complainant made a request to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for the postcodes of all employees at the ICO. The ICO disclosed to the complainant the first half of the postcode but refused to disclose the second half under section 40(2) of the Act, ‘personal data’. The Commissioner has investigated and found that the information withheld is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection and was therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-	{{DNSummaryBox
+{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50169424
-|dn_date=08/01/2008
+|dn_date=8 January 2008
 |dn_pa=Information Commissioner
-|dn_summary=is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection and was therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
+|dn_summary=The complainant made a request to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for the postcodes of all employees at the ICO. The ICO disclosed to the complainant the first half of the postcode but refused to disclose the second half under section 40(2) of the Act, ‘personal data’. The Commissioner has investigated and found that the information withheld is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection and was therefore exempt under section 40(2) of the Act.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50169424.pdf
 }}