FS50094496: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) CSV import |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision" |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50094496 | |dn_ref=FS50094496 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=3 July 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs | |dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information about a drug used in the prevention of dietary-induced laminitis in horses. Defra withheld the information, citing the exemption in section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption in section 43(1) was not applicable. However, he found that the exemption in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the information should therefore be released. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information about a drug used in the prevention of dietary-induced laminitis in horses. Defra withheld the information, citing the exemption in section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption in section 43(1) was not applicable. However, he found that the exemption in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the information should therefore be released. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 43 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:25, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50094496
- Date: 3 July 2008
- Public Authority: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
- Summary: The complainant requested information about a drug used in the prevention of dietary-induced laminitis in horses. Defra withheld the information, citing the exemption in section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption in section 43(1) was not applicable. However, he found that the exemption in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the information should therefore be released.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
