FS50079178: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50079178
|dn_ref=FS50079178
|dn_date=13/06/2005
|dn_date=13 June 2005
|dn_pa=Birmingham City Council
|dn_pa=Birmingham City Council
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a planning application. Council failed to respond within 20 working days. Council has subsequently responded and the Decision Notice did not therefore identify any steps to be taken. The Council lodged an appeal which has since been dismissed by the Information Tribunal.
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a planning application. Council failed to respond within 20 working days. Council has subsequently responded and the Decision Notice did not therefore identify any steps to be taken. The Council lodged an appeal which has since been dismissed by the Information Tribunal.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:24, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50079178
  • Date: 13 June 2005
  • Public Authority: Birmingham City Council
  • Summary: Complainant requested information relating to a planning application. Council failed to respond within 20 working days. Council has subsequently responded and the Decision Notice did not therefore identify any steps to be taken. The Council lodged an appeal which has since been dismissed by the Information Tribunal.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf