FS50079178: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50079178
|dn_ref=FS50079178
|dn_date=13/06/2005
|dn_date=13 June 2005
|dn_pa=Birmingham City Council
|dn_pa=Birmingham City Council
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a planning application. Council failed to respond within 20 working days. Council has subsequently responded and the Decision Notice did not therefore identify any steps to be taken. The Council lodged an appeal which has since been dismissed by the Information Tribunal.
|dn_summary=Complainant requested information relating to a planning application. Council failed to respond within 20 working days. Council has subsequently responded and the Decision Notice did not therefore identify any steps to be taken. The Council lodged an appeal which has since been dismissed by the Information Tribunal.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/79178%20dn.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/79178 dn.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision2
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:22, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50079178
  • Date: 13 June 2005
  • Public Authority: Birmingham City Council
  • Summary: Complainant requested information relating to a planning application. Council failed to respond within 20 working days. Council has subsequently responded and the Decision Notice did not therefore identify any steps to be taken. The Council lodged an appeal which has since been dismissed by the Information Tribunal.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf

Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2