Search results

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...by the exemption and that the public interest does favour maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner’s decision is that HMRC dealt with the request in accor
    1,016 bytes (152 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...confirm or deny if information is held) and 17(1)(b) (late reliance on an exemption from disclosure) of the Act.
    1 KB (173 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...pheld in this matter, and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption in this instance. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the a
    1,012 bytes (153 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ssioner finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 43 exemption. The public authority is accordingly directed to release the information.
    1 KB (177 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (204 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT101 - Failure to cite specific exemption section number (FOI)]]
    93 bytes (15 words) - 03:47, 17 September 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (206 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT63 - Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
    109 bytes (19 words) - 03:38, 17 September 2010
  • ...rectly in withholding the information in accordance with the section 43(2) exemption. However, the Commissioner finds that the public authority initially breach
    1 KB (165 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (218 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (218 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • ...ct appropriately in withholding the information requested by virtue of the exemption at section 40.
    731 bytes (105 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)