User:John Cross/digital library deposit consultation

From FOIwiki
Revision as of 21:43, 25 January 2010 by John Cross (talk | contribs) (Created page with ' ==Q1== '''What are your views on the options considered for this content?''' ==Q2== '''Are there any other options that should have been considered? If so what are they?''' ...')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Q1

What are your views on the options considered for this content?

Q2

Are there any other options that should have been considered? If so what are they?

Q3

Do you agree with the analysis of these options? Explain why.

Q4

Do you agree that harvesting provides the most efficient and timely solution for deposit of publications in this category? Explain why.

Q5

Do you agree regulation is the most cost-efficient method of collection for the Libraries and imposes no direct financial or administrative burden upon the publishers? Explain why.

Q6

Do you agree that this is an appropriate definition for the type of publications that should be included in scope for regulations? Explain why. Is there anything else that should be included in this definition? Is there anything that should be excluded from this definition?

Q7

Do you agree with the territorial definition of the UK web? Explain why. Is there anything else that should be included in this definition? Is there anything that should be excluded from this definition?

Q8

Do you agree with this analysis of the UK Web Domain? Explain why. What do you think the impact of your analysis would be?

Q9

How do you see a Deposit Library driven system of web harvesting interfacing with a publisher driven duty to deposit under the 2003 Act?