FS50248766: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50248766
|dn_ref=FS50248766
|dn_date=15/02/2010
|dn_date=15 February 2010
|dn_pa=General Medical Council
|dn_pa=General Medical Council
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request for information to the General Medical Council for copies of exhibits presented to the Professional Conduct Committee in the case of a named doctor. The request was refused under sections 40(2) and 41 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) and the application of exemptions was upheld at the internal review stage. The Commissioner considers the exemptions were correctly applied and therefore he requires no further action to be taken in respect of this case.
|dn_summary=The complainant made a request for information to the General Medical Council for copies of exhibits presented to the Professional Conduct Committee in the case of a named doctor. The request was refused under sections 40(2) and 41 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) and the application of exemptions was upheld at the internal review stage. The Commissioner considers the exemptions were correctly applied and therefore he requires no further action to be taken in respect of this case.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50248766.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50248766.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision2
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_section=FOI 41
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:19, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50248766
  • Date: 15 February 2010
  • Public Authority: General Medical Council
  • Summary: The complainant made a request for information to the General Medical Council for copies of exhibits presented to the Professional Conduct Committee in the case of a named doctor. The request was refused under sections 40(2) and 41 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act) and the application of exemptions was upheld at the internal review stage. The Commissioner considers the exemptions were correctly applied and therefore he requires no further action to be taken in respect of this case.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2