FS50229617: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
* Case Ref: FS50229617
{{DNSummaryBox
* Date: 19/04/2010
    |dn_ref=FS50229617
* Public Authority: Borough of Poole Council
    |dn_date=19/04/2010
* Summary: The complainant requested information concerning the results of a job evaluation process which the Council had undertaken. The Council refused the request citing section 40(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and decided that section 40(2) is not engaged and accordingly has ordered the release of the information. The Commissioner also found that the Council failed to meet the requirements of sections 1(1)(b) and 10(1) of the Act.
    |dn_pa=Borough of Poole Council
* Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld , FOI 40 - Complaint Upheld
    |dn_summary=The complainant requested information concerning the results of a job evaluation process which the Council had undertaken. The Council refused the request citing section 40(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and decided that section 40(2) is not engaged and accordingly has ordered the release of the information. The Commissioner also found that the Council failed to meet the requirements of sections 1(1)(b) and 10(1) of the Act.
* View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229617 http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229617.pdf


 
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229617.pdf}}
 
{{DNDecision|FOI 10|Upheld}}
[[Category:ICO Decision Notice]]
{{DNDecision|FOI 40|Upheld}}

Revision as of 01:56, 2 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50229617
  • Date: 19/04/2010
  • Public Authority: Borough of Poole Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested information concerning the results of a job evaluation process which the Council had undertaken. The Council refused the request citing section 40(2) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and decided that section 40(2) is not engaged and accordingly has ordered the release of the information. The Commissioner also found that the Council failed to meet the requirements of sections 1(1)(b) and 10(1) of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
  • Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]
  • Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]