FS50229268: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50229268 | |dn_ref=FS50229268 | ||
|dn_date=23 | |dn_date=23 September 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Leicester City Council | |dn_pa=Leicester City Council | ||
|dn_summary=‘personal data’. The Commissioner has investigated and is satisfied that the information is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection principle and section 40(2) is therefore engaged. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested that the council provide details of the monies paid in settlement to employees of a specific division over a six month period before proceeding to a full hearing at Employment Tribunal. The council refused to disclose the information citing section 40(2) ‘personal data’. The Commissioner has investigated and is satisfied that the information is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection principle and section 40(2) is therefore engaged. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50229268.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50229268.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50229268
- Date: 23 September 2009
- Public Authority: Leicester City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested that the council provide details of the monies paid in settlement to employees of a specific division over a six month period before proceeding to a full hearing at Employment Tribunal. The council refused to disclose the information citing section 40(2) ‘personal data’. The Commissioner has investigated and is satisfied that the information is personal data and that disclosure would breach the first data protection principle and section 40(2) is therefore engaged.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
