FS50210439: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50210439
|dn_ref=FS50210439
|dn_date=17/08/2009
|dn_date=17 August 2009
|dn_pa=Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
|dn_pa=Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
|dn_summary=The complainant asked Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust for copies of all job evaluations which took place during a period of 8 months and 3 days. The Commissioner found that Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded, but that the public authority had failed to provide advice and assistance in accordance with section 16(1) of the Act.
|dn_summary=The complainant asked Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust for copies of all job evaluations which took place during a period of 8 months and 3 days. The Commissioner found that Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded, but that the public authority had failed to provide advice and assistance in accordance with section 16(1) of the Act.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 16
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 16
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:38, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50210439
  • Date: 17 August 2009
  • Public Authority: Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
  • Summary: The complainant asked Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust for copies of all job evaluations which took place during a period of 8 months and 3 days. The Commissioner found that Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust acted correctly in refusing the request under section 12 of the Act as the appropriate limit would have been exceeded, but that the public authority had failed to provide advice and assistance in accordance with section 16(1) of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]