FS50132098: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
(XML import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50132098
|dn_ref=FS50132098
|dn_date=01/05/2008
|dn_date=01/05/2008
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_summary=The complainant wrote to the Ministry of Justice (formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs) to request information relating to a case heard at Coventry County Court, including a report which she believed had been produced in response to a complaint she had made about the court�s handling of the case. The public authority refused the request under section 32 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated the complaint and has found that the public authority does not hold a report regarding the complaint about the handling of the court case. The Commissioner is satisfied that any other requested information held by the public authority is exempt under section 32 of the Act. The Commissioner also found that the public authority breached section 10 of the Act in its handling of the request but requires no steps to be taken.
|dn_summary=that any other requested information held by the public authority is exempt under section 32 of the Act. The Commissioner also found that the public authority breached section 10 of the Act in its handling of the request but requires no steps to be taken.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50132098.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50132098.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 32
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:07, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50132098
  • Date: 01/05/2008
  • Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
  • Summary: that any other requested information held by the public authority is exempt under section 32 of the Act. The Commissioner also found that the public authority breached section 10 of the Act in its handling of the request but requires no steps to be taken.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]