FS50230718: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50230718.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50230718.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:39, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50230718
  • Date: 27 October 2009
  • Public Authority: Bedfordshire Police
  • Summary: In November 2008 the complainant made a request for information, about his complaint against a police officer, under the Freedom of Information Act (“the Act”). The public authority responded by neither confirming nor denying that it held information, referring to section 30 (investigations and proceedings conducted by public authorities) and section 40 (personal information). It later varied this citing section 40(2).
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]