FS50157117: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:32, 15 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50157117
Date: 22 October 2009
Public Authority: Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Summary: The complainant asked for information concerning HMRC’s Regional Review Programme, specifically in relation to the Leeds/Bradford/Shipley urban review centre. HMRC refused to disclose the requested information, citing the exemption in section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that HMRC had acted correctly in withholding the information.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 43 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-	{{DNSummaryBox
+{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50157117
-|dn_date=22/10/2009
+|dn_date=22 October 2009
 |dn_pa=Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
-|dn_summary=ning the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that HMRC had acted correctly in withholding the information.
+|dn_summary=The complainant asked for information concerning HMRC’s Regional Review Programme, specifically in relation to the Leeds/Bradford/Shipley urban review centre. HMRC refused to disclose the requested information, citing the exemption in section 43 of the Act. The Commissioner found that the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner therefore found that HMRC had acted correctly in withholding the information.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50157117.pdf
 }}