FS50150198: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50150198 | |dn_ref=FS50150198 | ||
|dn_date=17 | |dn_date=17 November 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Lancaster City Council | |dn_pa=Lancaster City Council | ||
|dn_summary=investigated and considers that the requested information is exempt by virtue of section 40(2) of the Act. He has therefore not gone on to consider the Council’s application of section 41(1). | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information from Lancaster City Council (‘the Council’) regarding its decision to award an enhanced pension to a former town clerk. Although the Council provided some information, it refused to disclose the remaining information under sections 40(2) and 41(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the Act’). The Commissioner has investigated and considers that the requested information is exempt by virtue of section 40(2) of the Act. He has therefore not gone on to consider the Council’s application of section 41(1). | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50150198.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50150198.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:27, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50150198
- Date: 17 November 2009
- Public Authority: Lancaster City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information from Lancaster City Council (‘the Council’) regarding its decision to award an enhanced pension to a former town clerk. Although the Council provided some information, it refused to disclose the remaining information under sections 40(2) and 41(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (‘the Act’). The Commissioner has investigated and considers that the requested information is exempt by virtue of section 40(2) of the Act. He has therefore not gone on to consider the Council’s application of section 41(1).
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
