FS50081570: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision") |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |dnd_section=FOI 42 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50081570
- Date: 27 November 2006
- Public Authority: Broadland District Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information about a complaint concerning a potential breach of planning regulations and subsequent documentation created following receipt of that complaint. The public authority released some of the information but refused to release the remainder on the basis it was exempt under sections 30, 31, 40 and 42 of the Act. The Commissioner found that these exemptions had been properly applied to the information that has been withheld and has not upheld that part of the complaint.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
