FS50081570: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50081570 | |dn_ref=FS50081570 | ||
|dn_date=27/11/2006 | |dn_date=27/11/2006 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 30 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 31 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 42 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:02, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50081570
- Date: 27/11/2006
- Public Authority: Broadland District Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information about a complaint concerning a potential breach of planning regulations and subsequent documentation created following receipt of that complaint. The public authority released some of the information but refused to release the remainder on the basis it was exempt under sections 30, 31, 40 and 42 of the Act. The Commissioner found that these exemptions had been properly applied to the information that has been withheld and has not upheld that part of the complaint.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 30 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 31 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
