FS50080372: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50080372
|dn_ref=FS50080372
|dn_date=19/03/2008
|dn_date=19 March 2008
|dn_pa=Chief Constable of Warwickshire Police
|dn_pa=Chief Constable of Warwickshire Police
|dn_summary=ty failed to comply with Regulation 14 when initially refusing the request, but that remedial action is not required.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information regarding an investigation carried out by the public authority into allegations that the decision to grant planning permission for ground close to the complainant’s property was made improperly. The public authority refused the request, on the basis that Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner finds that this exception is engaged and that the public interest favours the maintenance of the exception. The Commissioner also finds that the public authority failed to comply with Regulation 14 when initially refusing the request, but that remedial action is not required.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50080372.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50080372.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(b)
|dnd_section=EIR 12(5)(b)
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision2
|dnd_section=EIR 14
|dnd_section=EIR 14
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:22, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50080372
  • Date: 19 March 2008
  • Public Authority: Chief Constable of Warwickshire Police
  • Summary: The complainant requested information regarding an investigation carried out by the public authority into allegations that the decision to grant planning permission for ground close to the complainant’s property was made improperly. The public authority refused the request, on the basis that Regulation 12(5)(b) applied. The Commissioner finds that this exception is engaged and that the public interest favours the maintenance of the exception. The Commissioner also finds that the public authority failed to comply with Regulation 14 when initially refusing the request, but that remedial action is not required.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2