FS50063475: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replace - "DNDecision4" to "DNDecision")
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/63475 dn.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2005/63475 dn.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision1
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision2
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision3
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld

Latest revision as of 23:22, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50063475
  • Date: 5 July 2005
  • Public Authority: Nottingham City Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested various documents and agreements relating to the closure of a school and its handover to another school. The complainant alleged a number of breaches of the Act. The Council eventually provided all the information that they held on the matter although not within the time limit of twenty working days. Additionally, they directed the complainant to another source for some of the remaining information. The Decision Notice reflects the various findings in relation to each of the alleged breaches. The complainant has lodged an appeal. The Information Tribunal has ruled on this decision and has upheld this appeal.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: dn.pdf