FS50199605: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50199605
|dn_ref=FS50199605
|dn_date=09/07/2009
|dn_date=9 July 2009
|dn_pa=HM Revenue and Customs
|dn_pa=HM Revenue and Customs
|dn_summary=The complainant asked HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to provide him with information about the �weeding� of his tax files. HMRC provided him with relevant information but, when HMRC denied holding more information, he complained to the Commissioner. The Commissioner found that the Council was excluded from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(a) because if the information were held, it would constitute the personal data of the complainant.
|dn_summary=The complainant asked HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to provide him with information about the ‘weeding’ of his tax files. HMRC provided him with relevant information but, when HMRC denied holding more information, he complained to the Commissioner. The Commissioner found that the Council was excluded from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(a) because if the information were held, it would constitute the personal data of the complainant.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs50199605.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs50199605.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 1
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:37, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50199605
  • Date: 9 July 2009
  • Public Authority: HM Revenue and Customs
  • Summary: The complainant asked HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) to provide him with information about the ‘weeding’ of his tax files. HMRC provided him with relevant information but, when HMRC denied holding more information, he complained to the Commissioner. The Commissioner found that the Council was excluded from its duty to respond to the request under section 1(1)(a) by virtue of the provisions of section 40(5)(a) because if the information were held, it would constitute the personal data of the complainant.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Retrieved from "https://foiwiki.com/foiwiki/index.php?title=FS50199605&oldid=16996"