Transparency code for public authorities(draft): Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
==Contact details==
==Contact details==
Public authorities ought be required to make an email address, to which requests for information can be sent, available to the public. This ought be publicised on the organisations website. It should not be an individual's address, but a generic or role address so that requests sent to it can be properly dealt with in the absence of particular individuals.
Public authorities ought be required to make an email address, to which requests for information can be sent, available to the public. This ought be publicised on the organisations website. It should not be an individual's address, but a generic or role address so that requests sent to it can be properly dealt with in the absence of particular individuals.
==FOI Advice==
Authorities are encouraged to link to WhatDoTheyKnow.com to offer those requesting information the ability to do so in public, via a service which will permanently archive any response.
==Disclosure logs==
Authorities should publish all FOI requests and responses on online in a searchable manner. If any request cannot be published an explanation ought be given.


==Declaration==
==Declaration==

Revision as of 05:41, 31 October 2009

What is this page about?

Some of WhatDoTheyKnow.com's volunteers feel that the UK's Freedom of Information law does not currently go far enough to ensure real transparency. This is a draft of what good practice for public bodies might involve.

Public authorities

  • any body that is a public authority for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act 2000
  • any body that receives the majority of its funding from public funds
  • a company owned two thirds or more by public authorities
  • bodies with substantial public responsibilities

Public domain

Public authorities should acknowledge that the content of their responses to FOI requests are in the public domain.


ie. they ought follow the example of Bedfordshire Police who have attached the following statement to FOI responses:

"I am required by the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (The Act) to handle all requests in a manner that is blind to the identity of the requestor. Any information released in response to a request is regarded as being published, and therefore in the public domain without caveat."

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/19330/response/52966/attach/html/4/Response%20Letter%202009%2000710.doc.html

Publication scheme

  • Publication schemes ought be published on the organisation's website.
  • As much information as possible should be made available, as a matter of routine, on the organisation's website.
  • Public authorities without a publication scheme should respond to requests for details of the types of information they hold within 5 working days of a request being received.

Contact details

Public authorities ought be required to make an email address, to which requests for information can be sent, available to the public. This ought be publicised on the organisations website. It should not be an individual's address, but a generic or role address so that requests sent to it can be properly dealt with in the absence of particular individuals.

FOI Advice

Authorities are encouraged to link to WhatDoTheyKnow.com to offer those requesting information the ability to do so in public, via a service which will permanently archive any response.

Disclosure logs

Authorities should publish all FOI requests and responses on online in a searchable manner. If any request cannot be published an explanation ought be given.

Declaration

Public authorities not subject to the FOI act should make clear how they intend to respond to requests for information. ie. if they are willing to voluntarily comply with the act they should make this known.

If they are to impose additional restrictions eg. a lower cost limit then they should explain and justify this.