Template:DNSummaryBox: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
<noinclude>


* Case Ref: [[Decision Notice Reference::FS50229762]]
example data:
* Date: [[Decision Notice Date::19/04/2010]]
* Case Ref: FS50229762
* Public Authority: [[Public Authority::Ministry of Justice]]
* Date: 19/04/2010
* Public Authority: Public Authority::Ministry of Justice
* Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
* Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
* Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - [[FOI 1::Complaint Upheld]], FOI 10 - [[FOI 10::Complaint Upheld]] , FOI 16 - [[FOI 16::Complaint Upheld]]
* View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 <nowiki>http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf</nowiki>
* View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 [[Decision URL::http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf| ]] [http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf]
 
Need to include this separately:
* Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 16 - Complaint Upheld


* Usage:
* Usage:
Line 18: Line 21:


* grr, doesn't seem easy to pass in array of decisions for parsing in template eg f1=u~f2=n~f3=x... so using a separate template.
* grr, doesn't seem easy to pass in array of decisions for parsing in template eg f1=u~f2=n~f3=x... so using a separate template.
<!-- Include category -->
[[Category:ICO Decision Notice]]


</noinclude>
</noinclude>
Line 30: Line 37:


== Text of Decision ==
== Text of Decision ==
[[Category:ICO Decision Notice]]

Revision as of 18:51, 1 May 2010


example data:

  • Case Ref: FS50229762
  • Date: 19/04/2010
  • Public Authority: Public Authority::Ministry of Justice
  • Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf

Need to include this separately:

  • Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 16 - Complaint Upheld
  • Usage:
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=xxxxxxx
|dn_date=xxxx
|dn_pa=xxxx
|dn_summary=xxxx
|dn_url=xxxxx
}}
  • grr, doesn't seem easy to pass in array of decisions for parsing in template eg f1=u~f2=n~f3=x... so using a separate template.


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: {{{dn_ref}}}
  • Date: {{{dn_date}}}
  • Public Authority: {{{dn_pa}}}
  • Summary: {{{dn_summary}}}
  • View PDF of Decision Notice [{{{dn_url}}}]

Text of Decision