Search results

Page title matches

• FOISA Section 35 Exemption
  2 KB (338 words) - 18:56, 13 July 2008
• FOISA Section 36 Exemption
  565 bytes (78 words) - 18:57, 13 July 2008
• FOISA Section 37 Exemption
  1 KB (203 words) - 18:57, 13 July 2008
• FOISA Section 38 Exemption
  3 KB (409 words) - 18:59, 13 July 2008
• FOIA Section 43 Exemption
  ...judice the commercial interests of any person. It also includes a specific exemption for trade secrets. * Ministry of Justice guidance: [http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s43.pdf Section 43: commercial interests]
  3 KB (507 words) - 03:00, 7 January 2011
• FOIA Section 30 Exemption
  ...one of the investigation or litigation functions that are specified in the exemption. * Section 30 is quite a complex exemption and Departments will need to be alert to the precise terms in which its two
  8 KB (1,158 words) - 14:28, 17 July 2011
• FOISA Section 33 Exemption
  [[category:FOISA exemption]]
  858 bytes (118 words) - 18:19, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 31 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}}
  4 KB (664 words) - 19:24, 17 September 2010
• FOIA Section 44 Exemption
  ...are repeated below where more than one law / regulation was used for a s44 exemption ...t apply. In the appeal to the Information Tribunal, the CAA claimed a S44 exemption, and this was upheld (ref [http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/De
  26 KB (3,485 words) - 14:13, 16 January 2012
• FOIA Section 21 Exemption
  ...[http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s21.pdf Detailed Section 21 Exemption Guidance] ...eans-sec21.pdf Guidance explaining how public authorities should apply the exemption in section 21 of FOIA]
  4 KB (560 words) - 14:57, 16 October 2020
• FOISA Section 34 Exemption
  [[category:FOISA exemption]]
  2 KB (346 words) - 18:20, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 32 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}}
  3 KB (415 words) - 22:02, 4 May 2014
• FOIA Section 12 Exemption
  == Exemption where cost of compliance exceeds appropriate limit == {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 12}}
  2 KB (341 words) - 17:40, 28 September 2010
• FOIA Section 33 Exemption
  {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}}
  1 KB (176 words) - 15:56, 13 December 2011
• FOIA Section 34 Exemption
  Section 34 applies to information whose exemption is required in order to avoid an infringement of the privileges of either H ...formation has been published by Parliament then section 34 will not apply: exemption is not required in order to avoid an infringement of Parliamentary privileg
  31 KB (4,605 words) - 01:04, 1 March 2012
• FOISA Section 25 Exemption
  ...lable, such as Ordnance Survey maps, journals or books, is covered by this exemption. The SIC say that the market price for this type of information will genera [[category:FOISA exemption]]
  3 KB (417 words) - 00:36, 11 December 2011
• FOIA Section 22 Exemption
  == Section 22: Information Intended For Future Publication Exemption == | halign = left | source = [http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s22.pdf MoJ summary guidance].
  2 KB (281 words) - 09:51, 31 January 2015
• FOIA Section 35 Exemption
  ...ments and, where necessary, the DCA co-ordination unit to ensure that this exemption is properly applied; {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 35}}
  4 KB (636 words) - 19:23, 17 September 2010
• FOIA Section 22A Exemption
  The {{ukpga|2014|18}} added an exemption to the {{ukpga|2000|36}} for some kinds of research data. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 22A}}
  1 KB (215 words) - 00:56, 28 April 2015
• FOISA Section 26 Exemption
  [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
  410 bytes (55 words) - 00:37, 11 December 2011

Page text matches

• FS50094496
  ...on in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the
  774 bytes (111 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
• FS50122585
  ...able to other information, but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh that in disclosing the information in this instance.
  866 bytes (130 words) - 23:28, 15 May 2010
• FS50201819
  ...42(1) exemption correctly and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. This decision
  872 bytes (123 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• FS50203844
  ...at section 35 was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  917 bytes (131 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
• Absolute exemptions
  Where an absolute exemption is applied to information, a public authority is not required to go on to c There may be cases where the authority has mistakenly applied an absolute exemption, so it is worth checking the guidance and relevant decision notices.
  529 bytes (82 words) - 15:12, 14 July 2008
• FS50155395
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was therefore not engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
  1 KB (216 words) - 01:55, 28 July 2010
• FS50155418
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155423
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155424
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50139804
  ...s satisfied that the public authority has correctly applied the section 42 exemption and the public interest test correctly.
  763 bytes (108 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50157117
  ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  787 bytes (111 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50133972
  ...the Act was engaged and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
  913 bytes (137 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
• FS50155417
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (208 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155416
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (211 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50157702
  ...ction 35(1)(a) was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
  1 KB (149 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155388
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (210 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155420
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (215 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50155428
  ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
  1 KB (228 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
• FS50200694
  ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
  866 bytes (120 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
• FS50200695
  ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
  863 bytes (121 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010