Search results

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Page title matches

  • 20 bytes (3 words) - 12:31, 17 September 2010
  • 2 KB (338 words) - 15:56, 13 July 2008
  • 565 bytes (78 words) - 15:57, 13 July 2008
  • 1 KB (203 words) - 15:57, 13 July 2008
  • 3 KB (409 words) - 15:59, 13 July 2008
  • ...one of the investigation or litigation functions that are specified in the exemption. * Section 30 is quite a complex exemption and Departments will need to be alert to the precise terms in which its two
    8 KB (1,158 words) - 11:28, 17 July 2011
  • ...[http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s21.pdf Detailed Section 21 Exemption Guidance] ...://www.dca.gov.uk/foi/guidance/exguide/sec21/index.htm Detailed Section 21 Exemption Guidance] (superceded by MoJ Guidance)
    4 KB (521 words) - 16:27, 17 September 2010
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}}
    1 KB (176 words) - 12:56, 13 December 2011
  • == Section 22: Information Intended For Future Publication Exemption == | halign = left | source = [http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s22.pdf MoJ summary guidance].
    2 KB (281 words) - 06:51, 31 January 2015
  • ...tionally to outweigh the public interest in maintaining this aspect of the exemption; * In respect of both parts of this exemption, public authorities should be alive to the need to consult relevant departm
    5 KB (713 words) - 22:25, 18 January 2011
  • ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption. Detailed MoJ guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s23.pdf
    3 KB (489 words) - 14:42, 24 January 2011
  • | quote = Section 24 applies to information whose exemption from the right of access is required for the purpose of safeguarding nation ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption.
    2 KB (328 words) - 16:26, 17 September 2010
  • * Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s26.pdf ...uidance_10_-_the_defense_exemption.pdf Awareness Guidance 10 - the defence exemption] (AG10)
    2 KB (306 words) - 20:26, 12 December 2010
  • * MoJ: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s27.pdf {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 27}}
    3 KB (513 words) - 15:01, 18 December 2010
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 28}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 28}}
    2 KB (250 words) - 14:56, 24 January 2011
  • == Section 29: The Economy Exemption == ...uld be alive to the need to consult with HM Treasury when considering this exemption
    1 KB (173 words) - 16:25, 17 September 2010
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}}
    4 KB (664 words) - 16:24, 17 September 2010
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}}
    3 KB (415 words) - 19:02, 4 May 2014
  • Section 34 applies to information whose exemption is required in order to avoid an infringement of the privileges of either H ...formation has been published by Parliament then section 34 will not apply: exemption is not required in order to avoid an infringement of Parliamentary privileg
    31 KB (4,605 words) - 22:04, 29 February 2012
  • ...ments and, where necessary, the DCA co-ordination unit to ensure that this exemption is properly applied; {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 35}}
    4 KB (636 words) - 16:23, 17 September 2010

Page text matches

  • ...on in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the
    774 bytes (111 words) - 20:25, 15 May 2010
  • ...able to other information, but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh that in disclosing the information in this instance.
    866 bytes (130 words) - 20:28, 15 May 2010
  • ...42(1) exemption correctly and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. This decision
    872 bytes (123 words) - 20:38, 15 May 2010
  • ...at section 35 was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    917 bytes (131 words) - 20:38, 15 May 2010
  • Where an absolute exemption is applied to information, a public authority is not required to go on to c There may be cases where the authority has mistakenly applied an absolute exemption, so it is worth checking the guidance and relevant decision notices.
    529 bytes (82 words) - 12:12, 14 July 2008
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was therefore not engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (216 words) - 22:55, 27 July 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (200 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (200 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (200 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...s satisfied that the public authority has correctly applied the section 42 exemption and the public interest test correctly.
    763 bytes (108 words) - 20:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    787 bytes (111 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...the Act was engaged and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
    913 bytes (137 words) - 20:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (208 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (211 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ction 35(1)(a) was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    1 KB (149 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (210 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (215 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (228 words) - 20:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
    866 bytes (120 words) - 20:37, 15 May 2010
  • ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
    863 bytes (121 words) - 20:37, 15 May 2010

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)