Search results

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Page title matches

  • 20 bytes (3 words) - 15:31, 17 September 2010
  • 2 KB (338 words) - 18:56, 13 July 2008
  • 565 bytes (78 words) - 18:57, 13 July 2008
  • 1 KB (203 words) - 18:57, 13 July 2008
  • 3 KB (409 words) - 18:59, 13 July 2008
  • ...judice the commercial interests of any person. It also includes a specific exemption for trade secrets. * Ministry of Justice guidance: [http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s43.pdf Section 43: commercial interests]
    3 KB (507 words) - 03:00, 7 January 2011
  • ...one of the investigation or litigation functions that are specified in the exemption. * Section 30 is quite a complex exemption and Departments will need to be alert to the precise terms in which its two
    8 KB (1,158 words) - 14:28, 17 July 2011
  • [[category:FOISA exemption]]
    858 bytes (118 words) - 18:19, 11 December 2011
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 31}}
    4 KB (664 words) - 19:24, 17 September 2010
  • ...are repeated below where more than one law / regulation was used for a s44 exemption ...t apply. In the appeal to the Information Tribunal, the CAA claimed a S44 exemption, and this was upheld (ref [http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/De
    26 KB (3,485 words) - 14:13, 16 January 2012
  • ...[http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s21.pdf Detailed Section 21 Exemption Guidance] ...eans-sec21.pdf Guidance explaining how public authorities should apply the exemption in section 21 of FOIA]
    4 KB (560 words) - 14:57, 16 October 2020
  • [[category:FOISA exemption]]
    2 KB (346 words) - 18:20, 11 December 2011
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 32}}
    3 KB (415 words) - 22:02, 4 May 2014
  • == Exemption where cost of compliance exceeds appropriate limit == {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 12}}
    2 KB (341 words) - 17:40, 28 September 2010
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 33}}
    1 KB (176 words) - 15:56, 13 December 2011
  • Section 34 applies to information whose exemption is required in order to avoid an infringement of the privileges of either H ...formation has been published by Parliament then section 34 will not apply: exemption is not required in order to avoid an infringement of Parliamentary privileg
    31 KB (4,605 words) - 01:04, 1 March 2012
  • ...lable, such as Ordnance Survey maps, journals or books, is covered by this exemption. The SIC say that the market price for this type of information will genera [[category:FOISA exemption]]
    3 KB (417 words) - 00:36, 11 December 2011
  • == Section 22: Information Intended For Future Publication Exemption == | halign = left | source = [http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s22.pdf MoJ summary guidance].
    2 KB (281 words) - 09:51, 31 January 2015
  • ...ments and, where necessary, the DCA co-ordination unit to ensure that this exemption is properly applied; {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 35}}
    4 KB (636 words) - 19:23, 17 September 2010
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    410 bytes (55 words) - 00:37, 11 December 2011
  • ...tionally to outweigh the public interest in maintaining this aspect of the exemption; * In respect of both parts of this exemption, public authorities should be alive to the need to consult relevant departm
    5 KB (713 words) - 01:25, 19 January 2011
  • ...departments, this means that a Minister of the Crown must decide that the exemption applies before it can be relied on to refuse a request for information; {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 36}}
    6 KB (981 words) - 16:03, 2 June 2013
  • The {{ukpga|2014|18}} added an exemption to the {{ukpga|2000|36}} for some kinds of research data. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 22A}}
    1 KB (215 words) - 00:56, 28 April 2015
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    1 KB (208 words) - 00:37, 11 December 2011
  • ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption. Detailed MoJ guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s23.pdf
    3 KB (489 words) - 17:42, 24 January 2011
  • * Updated Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/foi-exemption-s38.pdf {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 38}}
    2 KB (272 words) - 19:23, 17 September 2010
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    624 bytes (82 words) - 00:38, 11 December 2011
  • | quote = Section 24 applies to information whose exemption from the right of access is required for the purpose of safeguarding nation ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption.
    2 KB (328 words) - 19:26, 17 September 2010
  • ::(b) would be so obliged but for any exemption contained in the regulations. [[category:exemption]]
    663 bytes (95 words) - 13:37, 16 April 2016
  • ::(b) would be so obliged but for any exemption contained in the regulations. {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 39}}
    2 KB (283 words) - 18:05, 24 January 2011
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    2 KB (321 words) - 00:38, 11 December 2011
  • * Ministry of Justice guidance: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s26.pdf ...uidance_10_-_the_defense_exemption.pdf Awareness Guidance 10 - the defence exemption] (AG10)
    2 KB (306 words) - 23:26, 12 December 2010
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    522 bytes (72 words) - 00:42, 11 December 2011
  • ...l_application/applying_schedule_condition_v1.pdf Update note: Applying the exemption for third party personal data: the Tribunal’s approach in House of Common {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 40}}
    7 KB (1,018 words) - 20:22, 11 January 2011
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    716 bytes (101 words) - 00:39, 11 December 2011
  • * MoJ: http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/docs/foi-exemption-s27.pdf {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 27}}
    3 KB (513 words) - 18:01, 18 December 2010
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    551 bytes (76 words) - 00:39, 11 December 2011
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 41}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 41}}
    2 KB (327 words) - 19:22, 17 September 2010
  • :(1) Information is exempt information if exemption from section 1(1) is required for the purpose of safeguarding national secu ...tificate signed by a member of the Scottish Executive certifying that such exemption is, or at any time was, required for the purpose of safeguarding national s
    1 KB (199 words) - 00:40, 11 December 2011
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 28}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 28}}
    2 KB (250 words) - 17:56, 24 January 2011
  • 563 bytes (88 words) - 00:35, 14 July 2011
  • {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=FOI 42}} {{DNExemptionInfoBox|exemption=FOI 42}}
    2 KB (246 words) - 15:41, 17 September 2010
  • [[Category:FOISA exemption]]
    2 KB (267 words) - 00:41, 11 December 2011
  • == Section 29: The Economy Exemption == ...uld be alive to the need to consult with HM Treasury when considering this exemption
    1 KB (173 words) - 19:25, 17 September 2010
  • * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 2|s2(2)(b)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(1)(b)|Reg 12(1)(b)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Public interest inherent in exemption / exception]]
    8 KB (1,177 words) - 16:48, 17 September 2010
  • * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 17|s17(1)(b)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Failure to cite specific exemption section number]]
    4 KB (553 words) - 18:15, 17 September 2010
  • * Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 17|s17(1)(b)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 14(3)|reg 14(3)]] * Issue: [[LTT Title::Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
    6 KB (890 words) - 17:52, 17 September 2010
  • ...emption::FOI 36|s36]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(4)(e)|reg 12(4)(e)]], [[LTT Exemption::EIR 12(5)(f)|reg 12(5)(f)]] ...e::Public interest arguments presented in favour of maintaining a relevant exemption for withholding information on lobbyists]]]
    31 KB (4,987 words) - 15:43, 25 July 2011

Page text matches

  • ...on in section 43(2) was engaged but the public interest in maintaining the exemption did not outweigh the public interest in disclosing the information and the
    774 bytes (111 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
  • ...able to other information, but that the public interest in maintaining the exemption does not outweigh that in disclosing the information in this instance.
    866 bytes (130 words) - 23:28, 15 May 2010
  • ...42(1) exemption correctly and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. This decision
    872 bytes (123 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
  • ...at section 35 was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    917 bytes (131 words) - 23:38, 15 May 2010
  • Where an absolute exemption is applied to information, a public authority is not required to go on to c There may be cases where the authority has mistakenly applied an absolute exemption, so it is worth checking the guidance and relevant decision notices.
    529 bytes (82 words) - 15:12, 14 July 2008
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was therefore not engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (216 words) - 01:55, 28 July 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...s satisfied that the public authority has correctly applied the section 42 exemption and the public interest test correctly.
    763 bytes (108 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    787 bytes (111 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...the Act was engaged and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
    913 bytes (137 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (208 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (211 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ction 35(1)(a) was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    1 KB (149 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (210 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (215 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    1 KB (228 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
    866 bytes (120 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
  • ...ic interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs that in disclosure. The exemption at section 31(1) has therefore not been further considered. The complaint i
    863 bytes (121 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
  • ...sted information with the public interest favouring the maintenance of the exemption. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal but the Tribunal has ruled
    861 bytes (128 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ''' EIR 12(5)(c) exemption - intellectual property rights ''' {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(5)(c)}}
    284 bytes (34 words) - 19:34, 17 September 2010
  • ''' EIR 12(4)(d) exemption - unfinished/incomplete data ''' {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(4)(d)}}
    282 bytes (34 words) - 19:33, 17 September 2010
  • ...the Act was engaged and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exemption.
    1 KB (170 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
  • ...icable to the information, and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
    939 bytes (138 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
  • ''' EIR 12(4)(e) exemption - internal communications ''' {{LTTInfoBox|exemption=EIR 12(4)(e)}}
    278 bytes (33 words) - 19:34, 17 September 2010
  • ...mption was engaged and the public interest favoured the maintenance of the exemption.
    1 KB (181 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...the exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissio
    979 bytes (134 words) - 23:30, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT14 - Public interest inherent in exemption / exception]]
    86 bytes (13 words) - 03:33, 17 September 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (181 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...tisfied that the public authority was entitled to rely upon the section 41 exemption to withhold the information as the legal advice was shared with it as part
    2 KB (223 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...)(a) exemption was engaged and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information which had ther
    1,004 bytes (146 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 32 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:19, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 31 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:18, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 22 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 12 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:28, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 40 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:23, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 33 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:19, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 23 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 36 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:21, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 39 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:23, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 35 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:20, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 30 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:17, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 41 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:23, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 29 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:27, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 44 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 12:58, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 34 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:20, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 26 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 28 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:27, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 43 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 12:49, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 37 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:22, 5 May 2010
  • * Main article: [[FOIA Section 44 Exemption]]
    89 bytes (10 words) - 12:59, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 24 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 42 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:23, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 27 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:27, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 38 Exemption]]
    88 bytes (10 words) - 15:22, 5 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 21 Exemption]]
    87 bytes (10 words) - 15:26, 5 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption would not be engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decision in
    2 KB (225 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...losure. Therefore, in so far as the public authority correctly applied the exemption under section 42 of the Act, it has complied with its obligations under sec
    1 KB (154 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...applies to all the remaining information sought by the complainant so the exemption at section 31 has not been further considered.
    1 KB (177 words) - 23:37, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (189 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (189 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...h he finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 40(2) exemption.
    1 KB (152 words) - 23:25, 15 May 2010
  • ...ner further finds that in this case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure. However, the Commissioner also
    1 KB (201 words) - 23:24, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (198 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...gal professional privilege and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
    1 KB (146 words) - 23:22, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • == Section 29: The Economy Exemption == ...uld be alive to the need to consult with HM Treasury when considering this exemption
    1 KB (173 words) - 19:25, 17 September 2010
  • ...by the exemption and that the public interest does favour maintaining the exemption. The Commissioner’s decision is that HMRC dealt with the request in accor
    1,016 bytes (152 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...confirm or deny if information is held) and 17(1)(b) (late reliance on an exemption from disclosure) of the Act.
    1 KB (173 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (200 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...pheld in this matter, and that the public interest favours maintaining the exemption in this instance. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the a
    1,012 bytes (153 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...ssioner finds that the public authority incorrectly applied the section 43 exemption. The public authority is accordingly directed to release the information.
    1 KB (177 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (204 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (205 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT101 - Failure to cite specific exemption section number (FOI)]]
    93 bytes (15 words) - 03:47, 17 September 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (206 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Line to take - LTT63 - Failure to specify an exemption / exception on which the PA later relies]]
    109 bytes (19 words) - 03:38, 17 September 2010
  • ...rectly in withholding the information in accordance with the section 43(2) exemption. However, the Commissioner finds that the public authority initially breach
    1 KB (165 words) - 23:26, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (218 words) - 23:32, 15 May 2010
  • ...ure of the majority of the information would not be actionable in law. The exemption was not therefore engaged by this information. The Commissioner’s decisio
    1 KB (218 words) - 23:31, 15 May 2010
  • ...ct appropriately in withholding the information requested by virtue of the exemption at section 40.
    731 bytes (105 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • ...e. The Commissioner is not satisfied that the section 31 (law enforcement) exemption is engaged. The Commissioner is not satisfied that the refusal notice issue
    1 KB (157 words) - 23:23, 15 May 2010
  • | quote = Section 24 applies to information whose exemption from the right of access is required for the purpose of safeguarding nation ...certification procedure exists where it becomes necessary to rely on this exemption.
    2 KB (328 words) - 19:26, 17 September 2010
  • ...red the information and is satisfied that the information falls within the exemption in section 41 of the Act.
    711 bytes (106 words) - 23:40, 15 May 2010
  • ...ed. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply the exemption under section 40 of the Act to the requested information, and therefore the
    742 bytes (111 words) - 23:29, 15 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 33 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 31 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 35 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 43 Exemption]]
    124 bytes (14 words) - 16:34, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 36 Exemption]]
    125 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
  • Main article: [[FOIA Section 29 Exemption]]
    124 bytes (14 words) - 16:33, 6 May 2010
View (previous 100 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)