Difference between revisions of "Line to take - LTT143 - Reasonably accessible information"

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(ltt143)
 
(LTT143 - 27/09/2010 version. 1st transposition of OCR'ed ICO Jan 2011 PDF)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* FOI/EIR: FOI, EIR
 
* FOI/EIR: FOI, EIR
* Section/Regulation: s21(1), s21(2)(a), s21(2)(b), reg 6(1)(b)  
+
* Section/Regulation: [[LTT Exemption::FOI 21|s21(1)]], s21(2)(a), s21(2)(b), [[LTT Exemption::EIR 6(1)(b)|reg 6(1)(b)]]
* Issue: Reasonably accessible information  
+
* Issue: [[LTT Title::Reasonably accessible information]]
 
* Source: Information Tribunal
 
* Source: Information Tribunal
* Details: Cohn P England / London Borough of Bexley (10 May 2007)  
+
* Details: Colin P England / London Borough of Bexley (10 May 2007)  
 
* Related Lines to Take: [[LTT25]], [[LTT26]], [[LTT119]]  
 
* Related Lines to Take: [[LTT25]], [[LTT26]], [[LTT119]]  
 
* Related Documents: [[EA/2006/0060]] & [[EA/2006/0066]] (England),  
 
* Related Documents: [[EA/2006/0060]] & [[EA/2006/0066]] (England),  
 
* Contact: HD  
 
* Contact: HD  
* Date: 18/02/2009
+
* Date: [[LTT Date::27/09/2010]]
* Policy Reference: LTT143
+
* Policy Reference: [[LTT Ref::LTT143]]
 
+
* {{Copyright-ICO}}
 +
[[Category:ICO Line To Take]]
 +
  
 
== Line to take ==
 
== Line to take ==
  
The phrase ‘reasonably accessible’ under s21 refers to whether the applicant can reasonably obtain the requested information. It does not refer to whether the applicant can access a reasonable proportion of the information requested.  
+
The phrase ‘reasonably accessible’ under s21 refers to whether the applicant can reasonably obtain all the requested information. It does not refer to whether the applicant can access a reasonable proportion of the information requested to which the exemption has been applied.  
  
  
Line 22: Line 24:
 
:“''21. — (1) Information which is reasonably accessible to the applicant otherwise than under s1 is exempt information''”.  
 
:“''21. — (1) Information which is reasonably accessible to the applicant otherwise than under s1 is exempt information''”.  
  
In the case of Cohn P England v London Borough of Bexley, the complainant asked for the addresses of empty properties in Bexley, the reasons why the properties were empty and other information about the properties’ ownership. The Land Registry holds details of land ownership for registered but not unregistered land and around 30% of land is unregistered. Thus whilst it would be reasonable to expect the complainant to approach the Land Registry, he would not be able to obtain all the information he had requested in this way.  
+
In the case of Colin P England v London Borough of Bexley, the complainant asked for the addresses of empty properties in Bexley, the reasons why the properties were empty and other information about the properties’ ownership. The Land Registry holds details of land ownership for registered but not unregistered land and around 30% of land is unregistered. Thus whilst it would be reasonable to expect the complainant to approach the Land Registry, he would not be able to obtain all the information he had requested in this way.  
  
The issue before the Tribunal was whether the fact that 70% of the information requested was available meant that the information requested was reasonably accessible or whether all the information had to be reasonably accessible.  
+
The issue before the Tribunal was whether the fact that 70% of the information requested was available meant that the information requested was reasonably accessible or whether '''all''' the information had to be reasonably accessible.  
  
 
One dissenting member of the Tribunal agreed with the decision notice in finding that the requested information was reasonably accessible to the complainant because “''...in section 21 the word ‘reasonably’ qualifies the ‘accessible’...''” (para 113).  
 
One dissenting member of the Tribunal agreed with the decision notice in finding that the requested information was reasonably accessible to the complainant because “''...in section 21 the word ‘reasonably’ qualifies the ‘accessible’...''” (para 113).  
Line 32: Line 34:
 
:“''...in the majority’s view, ‘reasonably accessible’ applies to the mechanism that any applicant has available to him or her to obtain the information. We do not interpret the section as stating that a public authority has no obligation to provide information where a reasonable amount of that information is available elsewhere...''” (para 113).  
 
:“''...in the majority’s view, ‘reasonably accessible’ applies to the mechanism that any applicant has available to him or her to obtain the information. We do not interpret the section as stating that a public authority has no obligation to provide information where a reasonable amount of that information is available elsewhere...''” (para 113).  
  
The Commissioner now considers that the approach taken by the majority is the correct one. Thus, s21 can only be claimed where '''all''' the requested information is reasonably available to the complainant and any investigation will consider how reasonable it would be for the complainant to access the entirety of the information requested.  
+
The Commissioner now considers that the approach taken by the majority is the correct one. Thus, s21 can only be claimed where '''all''' the requested information is reasonably available to the complainant and any investigation will consider how reasonable it would be for the complainant to access all the information to which the exemption has been applied.  
 +
 
  
 
'''Environmental Information Regulations '''
 
'''Environmental Information Regulations '''
  
 
The Commissioner considers that the above approach may be useful only insofar as specifically interpreting the “''...already publicly available...''” element of Regulation 6(1)(b) but this should not be read across to other aspects of Regulation 6 (see [[LTT119]]).
 
The Commissioner considers that the above approach may be useful only insofar as specifically interpreting the “''...already publicly available...''” element of Regulation 6(1)(b) but this should not be read across to other aspects of Regulation 6 (see [[LTT119]]).

Latest revision as of 21:06, 12 February 2011

  • FOI/EIR: FOI, EIR
  • Section/Regulation: s21(1), s21(2)(a), s21(2)(b), reg 6(1)(b)
  • Issue: Reasonably accessible information
  • Source: Information Tribunal
  • Details: Colin P England / London Borough of Bexley (10 May 2007)
  • Related Lines to Take: LTT25, LTT26, LTT119
  • Related Documents: EA/2006/0060 & EA/2006/0066 (England),
  • Contact: HD
  • Date: 27/09/2010
  • Policy Reference: LTT143
  • © Copyright Information Commissioner's Office, re-used with permission
  • Original source linked from here: LTT


Line to take

The phrase ‘reasonably accessible’ under s21 refers to whether the applicant can reasonably obtain all the requested information. It does not refer to whether the applicant can access a reasonable proportion of the information requested to which the exemption has been applied.


Further Information

Section 21 of the FOIA states as follows:

21. — (1) Information which is reasonably accessible to the applicant otherwise than under s1 is exempt information”.

In the case of Colin P England v London Borough of Bexley, the complainant asked for the addresses of empty properties in Bexley, the reasons why the properties were empty and other information about the properties’ ownership. The Land Registry holds details of land ownership for registered but not unregistered land and around 30% of land is unregistered. Thus whilst it would be reasonable to expect the complainant to approach the Land Registry, he would not be able to obtain all the information he had requested in this way.

The issue before the Tribunal was whether the fact that 70% of the information requested was available meant that the information requested was reasonably accessible or whether all the information had to be reasonably accessible.

One dissenting member of the Tribunal agreed with the decision notice in finding that the requested information was reasonably accessible to the complainant because “...in section 21 the word ‘reasonably’ qualifies the ‘accessible’...” (para 113).

However, the majority decision of the Tribunal found that:

...in the majority’s view, ‘reasonably accessible’ applies to the mechanism that any applicant has available to him or her to obtain the information. We do not interpret the section as stating that a public authority has no obligation to provide information where a reasonable amount of that information is available elsewhere...” (para 113).

The Commissioner now considers that the approach taken by the majority is the correct one. Thus, s21 can only be claimed where all the requested information is reasonably available to the complainant and any investigation will consider how reasonable it would be for the complainant to access all the information to which the exemption has been applied.


Environmental Information Regulations

The Commissioner considers that the above approach may be useful only insofar as specifically interpreting the “...already publicly available...” element of Regulation 6(1)(b) but this should not be read across to other aspects of Regulation 6 (see LTT119).