FS50281100: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50281100 | |dn_ref=FS50281100 | ||
|dn_date=15/03/2010 | |dn_date=15/03/2010 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50281100
- Date: 15/03/2010
- Public Authority: Chief Constable of Kent Police
- Summary: The complainant requested the names, ranks and collar numbers of the police officers involved in making an arrest of a photographer, under the powers contained in section 44 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2000. The public authority refused the request under section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, claiming that the information was sensitive personal data and should not be disclosed. The Commissioner finds that, in the circumstances that the request was made, disclosure of the requested information would breach the first data protection principle. The exemption provided by section 40(2) is therefore engaged and the public authority is not required to take any steps.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
