FS50255918: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50255918
|dn_ref=FS50255918
|dn_date=26/10/2009
|dn_date=26 October 2009
|dn_pa=South Kesteven District Council
|dn_pa=South Kesteven District Council
|dn_summary=’s personal data and to release it would be unfair to him. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Council was correct to apply the exemption in this case; he does not therefore require the Council to take any further steps in respect of this request.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from South Kesteven District Council (the Council) relating to the termination of contract of the Chief Executive. The Council withheld this information on the grounds that section 40(2) of the Act applied; in that the information requested constituted the Chief Executive’s personal data and to release it would be unfair to him. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Council was correct to apply the exemption in this case; he does not therefore require the Council to take any further steps in respect of this request.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50255918.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50255918.pdf
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:40, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50255918
  • Date: 26 October 2009
  • Public Authority: South Kesteven District Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested information from South Kesteven District Council (the Council) relating to the termination of contract of the Chief Executive. The Council withheld this information on the grounds that section 40(2) of the Act applied; in that the information requested constituted the Chief Executive’s personal data and to release it would be unfair to him. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Council was correct to apply the exemption in this case; he does not therefore require the Council to take any further steps in respect of this request.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]