FS50255373: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50255373 | |dn_ref=FS50255373 | ||
|dn_date=29 | |dn_date=29 March 2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Attorney | |dn_pa=Attorney General’s Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the Attorney | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the Attorney General’s Office about the superintendence of the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to the Employment Tribunal case of another individual. The Commissioner finds that, apart from a small piece of information disclosed during the course of his investigation, the information was correctly withheld under section 40 (personal information). However, he finds that procedural breaches were committed. He requires no steps to be taken. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50255373.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50255373.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 23:40, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50255373
- Date: 29 March 2010
- Public Authority: Attorney General’s Office
- Summary: The complainant requested information from the Attorney General’s Office about the superintendence of the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to the Employment Tribunal case of another individual. The Commissioner finds that, apart from a small piece of information disclosed during the course of his investigation, the information was correctly withheld under section 40 (personal information). However, he finds that procedural breaches were committed. He requires no steps to be taken.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions