FS50250552: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50250552 | |dn_ref=FS50250552 | ||
|dn_date=24/09/2009 | |dn_date=24/09/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Department for Transport | |dn_pa=Department for Transport | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=it also breached section 10(1) of the Act. Finally in relation to the bonus information, as the DfT did not explain why and under which exemption this information could not be disclosed prior to the Commissioner’s investigation, it breached section 17(1)(a)(b) and (c) of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50250552.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50250552.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:25, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50250552
- Date: 24/09/2009
- Public Authority: Department for Transport
- Summary: it also breached section 10(1) of the Act. Finally in relation to the bonus information, as the DfT did not explain why and under which exemption this information could not be disclosed prior to the Commissioner’s investigation, it breached section 17(1)(a)(b) and (c) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions