FS50247797: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50247797
|dn_ref=FS50247797
|dn_date=09/09/2009
|dn_date=9 September 2009
|dn_pa=Brighton and Hove City Council
|dn_pa=Brighton and Hove City Council
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the council regarding its decision to settle claims in relation to the phasing out of the Voucher Parking Scheme. The Council refused to disclose the information by virtue of section 42(1) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that the information is exempt by virtue of section 42(1) and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure of the information.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the council regarding its decision to settle claims in relation to the phasing out of the Voucher Parking Scheme. The Council refused to disclose the information by virtue of section 42(1) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that the information is exempt by virtue of section 42(1) and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure of the information.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 42
|dnd_section=FOI 42
|2=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:40, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50247797
  • Date: 9 September 2009
  • Public Authority: Brighton and Hove City Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested information from the council regarding its decision to settle claims in relation to the phasing out of the Voucher Parking Scheme. The Council refused to disclose the information by virtue of section 42(1) of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and concluded that the information is exempt by virtue of section 42(1) and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure of the information.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]