FS50243486: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50243486 | |dn_ref=FS50243486 | ||
|dn_date=24 | |dn_date=24 February 2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Home Office | |dn_pa=Home Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested the total sum of money provided by the public authority to Thames Valley Police in order to fund the policing operation relating to the new animal research centre at the University of Oxford. The public authority refused to disclose this, citing the exemptions provided by sections 31(1)(a) (prejudice to the prevention or detection of crime) and 38(1)(a) and (b) (endangerment to health and safety). The Commissioner finds that these exemptions are not engaged and the public authority is required to disclose the information in question. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested the total sum of money provided by the public authority to Thames Valley Police in order to fund the policing operation relating to the new animal research centre at the University of Oxford. The public authority refused to disclose this, citing the exemptions provided by sections 31(1)(a) (prejudice to the prevention or detection of crime) and 38(1)(a) and (b) (endangerment to health and safety). The Commissioner finds that these exemptions are not engaged and the public authority is required to disclose the information in question. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50243486.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50243486.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 10 | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision2 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision3 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 31 | |dnd_section=FOI 31 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision4 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 38 | |dnd_section=FOI 38 | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50243486
- Date: 24 February 2010
- Public Authority: Home Office
- Summary: The complainant requested the total sum of money provided by the public authority to Thames Valley Police in order to fund the policing operation relating to the new animal research centre at the University of Oxford. The public authority refused to disclose this, citing the exemptions provided by sections 31(1)(a) (prejudice to the prevention or detection of crime) and 38(1)(a) and (b) (endangerment to health and safety). The Commissioner finds that these exemptions are not engaged and the public authority is required to disclose the information in question.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2 Template:DNDecision3 Template:DNDecision4
