FS50235016: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50235016 | |dn_ref=FS50235016 | ||
|dn_date=04/03/2010 | |dn_date=04/03/2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust | |dn_pa=Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=plied the section 36(2)(b)(ii) exemption. The Commissioner does however consider that the Trust breached section 1(1)(b) and section 10(1) in its handling of the request. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50235016 .pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50235016%20.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 36 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 19:26, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50235016
- Date: 04/03/2010
- Public Authority: Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
- Summary: plied the section 36(2)(b)(ii) exemption. The Commissioner does however consider that the Trust breached section 1(1)(b) and section 10(1) in its handling of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 36 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
