FS50232866: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50232866 | |dn_ref=FS50232866 | ||
|dn_date=02/09/2009 | |dn_date=02/09/2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Metropolitan Police Service | |dn_pa=Metropolitan Police Service | ||
|dn_summary= | |dn_summary=ection 17(1)(b) and (c) in failing to apply section 40(2) and failing to explain why within the twenty day statutory timescale. He requires no remedial steps to be taken in this case. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50232866.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50232866.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 17 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:24, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50232866
- Date: 02/09/2009
- Public Authority: Metropolitan Police Service
- Summary: ection 17(1)(b) and (c) in failing to apply section 40(2) and failing to explain why within the twenty day statutory timescale. He requires no remedial steps to be taken in this case.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions