FS50229762: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref= | |dn_ref=FS50229762 | ||
|dn_date=19/04/2010 | |dn_date=19/04/2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | |dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf | ||
}} | |||
FOI 1 | {{DNDecision|FOI 1|Upheld}} | ||
{{DNDecision|FOI 10|Upheld}} | |||
{{DNDecision|FOI 16|Upheld}} | |||
Revision as of 18:41, 1 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50229762
- Date: 19/04/2010
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]
- Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]
- Section of Act / Finding: {{{dnd_section}}} - "{{{dnd_section}}}" contains a listed "{" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. - [[Property:{{{dnd_section}}}|Find other matching decisions]]
