FS50229762: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== test of template == | |||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50229762TEST | |||
|dn_date=19/04/2010 | |||
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice | |||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request. | |||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf | |||
}} | |||
Revision as of 18:24, 1 May 2010
- Case Ref: FS50229762
- Date: 19/04/2010
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
- Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 1 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld , FOI 16 - Complaint Upheld
- View PDF of Decision Notice FS50229762 [1]
test of template
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50229762TEST
- Date: 19/04/2010
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [2]
