FS50229762: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50229762
|dn_ref=FS50229762
|dn_date=19/04/2010
|dn_date=19 April 2010
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_pa=Ministry of Justice
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the "Tribunal") has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50229762.pdf
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:39, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50229762
  • Date: 19 April 2010
  • Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
  • Summary: The complainant requested information that would document that the Information Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) has wide powers under Rule 14(1) of the Information Tribunal (Enforcement Appeals) Rules 2005. The Commissioner is satisfied that the Tribunal does not hold this information and therefore does not require the authority to take any steps. However, he has found that the Tribunal breached sections 1(1)(a), 10(1) and 16(1) in its handling of the request.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]