FS50219758: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50219758
|dn_ref=FS50219758
|dn_date=23/02/2010
|dn_date=23 February 2010
|dn_pa=Home Office
|dn_pa=Home Office
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the proscription of the Baluchistan Liberation Army. The Home Office refused the request citing sections 23 (information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matter), 27 (international relations), 35 (formulation of government policy) and 42 (legal professional privilege). During the course of the Commissioner�s investigation, the Home Office additionally cited section 24 (national security). The Commissioner finds that some information was incorrectly withheld under section 27 and 35 and orders its disclosure. He also finds the public authority in breach of sections 1(1)(a) and (b), 10(1), 17(1) and 17(1)(b) and (c).
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the proscription of the Baluchistan Liberation Army. The Home Office refused the request citing sections 23 (information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matter), 27 (international relations), 35 (formulation of government policy) and 42 (legal professional privilege). During the course of the Commissioner’s investigation, the Home Office additionally cited section 24 (national security). The Commissioner finds that some information was incorrectly withheld under section 27 and 35 and orders its disclosure. He also finds the public authority in breach of sections 1(1)(a) and (b), 10(1), 17(1) and 17(1)(b) and (c).
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50219758.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50219758.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 42
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|2=Partly Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 23
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 24
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 27
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 35
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 42
|dnd_finding=Partly Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:39, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50219758
  • Date: 23 February 2010
  • Public Authority: Home Office
  • Summary: The complainant requested information relating to the proscription of the Baluchistan Liberation Army. The Home Office refused the request citing sections 23 (information supplied by, or relating to, bodies dealing with security matter), 27 (international relations), 35 (formulation of government policy) and 42 (legal professional privilege). During the course of the Commissioner’s investigation, the Home Office additionally cited section 24 (national security). The Commissioner finds that some information was incorrectly withheld under section 27 and 35 and orders its disclosure. He also finds the public authority in breach of sections 1(1)(a) and (b), 10(1), 17(1) and 17(1)(b) and (c).
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]