FS50211438: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50211438 | |dn_ref=FS50211438 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=3 February 2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Lincolnshire County Council | |dn_pa=Lincolnshire County Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of all correspondence relating to two incidents he believed occurred at a named school involving knifes and information relating to any further incidents that may have taken place. The Council responded informing the complainant that it was not obliged to confirm or deny if the information is held by virtue of section 40(5)(b)(i) of the Act. As he remained dissatisfied, the complainant approached the Commissioner. The Commissioner has investigated the case and is satisfied that the Council correctly applied section 40(5)(b)(i) of the Act. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested copies of all correspondence relating to two incidents he believed occurred at a named school involving knifes and information relating to any further incidents that may have taken place. The Council responded informing the complainant that it was not obliged to confirm or deny if the information is held by virtue of section 40(5)(b)(i) of the Act. As he remained dissatisfied, the complainant approached the Commissioner. The Commissioner has investigated the case and is satisfied that the Council correctly applied section 40(5)(b)(i) of the Act. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50211438.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2010/fs_50211438.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50211438
- Date: 3 February 2010
- Public Authority: Lincolnshire County Council
- Summary: The complainant requested copies of all correspondence relating to two incidents he believed occurred at a named school involving knifes and information relating to any further incidents that may have taken place. The Council responded informing the complainant that it was not obliged to confirm or deny if the information is held by virtue of section 40(5)(b)(i) of the Act. As he remained dissatisfied, the complainant approached the Commissioner. The Commissioner has investigated the case and is satisfied that the Council correctly applied section 40(5)(b)(i) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
