FS50209825: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50209825 | |dn_ref=FS50209825 | ||
|dn_date= | |dn_date=8 July 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust | |dn_pa=Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested the mortality figures for a (named Doctor). The public authority refused to comply with the request by virtue of the provisions of section 12(1) of the Act. The Commissioner finds the public authority correctly relied on section 12(1). He however also finds that the public authority in breach of section 10(1) for failing to inform the complainant it held the information requested within 20 working days, and 17(5) for failing to specify within 20 working days that it was not complying with the request by virtue of the provision at section 12(1). | |dn_summary=The complainant requested the mortality figures for a (named Doctor). The public authority refused to comply with the request by virtue of the provisions of section 12(1) of the Act. The Commissioner finds the public authority correctly relied on section 12(1). He however also finds that the public authority in breach of section 10(1) for failing to inform the complainant it held the information requested within 20 working days, and 17(5) for failing to specify within 20 working days that it was not complying with the request by virtue of the provision at section 12(1). | ||
Latest revision as of 23:38, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50209825
- Date: 8 July 2009
- Public Authority: Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust
- Summary: The complainant requested the mortality figures for a (named Doctor). The public authority refused to comply with the request by virtue of the provisions of section 12(1) of the Act. The Commissioner finds the public authority correctly relied on section 12(1). He however also finds that the public authority in breach of section 10(1) for failing to inform the complainant it held the information requested within 20 working days, and 17(5) for failing to specify within 20 working days that it was not complying with the request by virtue of the provision at section 12(1).
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
