FS50204417: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:23, 3 May 2010

Case Ref: FS50204417
Date: 05/10/2009
Public Authority: London Borough of Bromley
Summary: ion Act 2000 (“the FOIA”) and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner found breaches of section 17(3)(b) and 17(7) of the FOIA.
View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions

Section of Act / Finding: FOI 42 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{DNSummaryBox
+	{{DNSummaryBox
 |dn_ref=FS50204417
 |dn_date=05/10/2009
 |dn_pa=London Borough of Bromley
-|dn_summary=The complainant asked to be provided with the external legal advice provided to the London Borough of Bromley (�the Council�) relating to the evidence the Council said it held at a planning meeting in 2002 that Manor Park was a public highway. The Information Commissioner (�the Commissioner�) investigated and decided that the legal advice held was exempt under section 42(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (�the FOIA�) and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner found breaches of section 17(3)(b) and 17(7) of the FOIA.
+|dn_summary=ion Act 2000 (“the FOIA”) and that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. The Commissioner found breaches of section 17(3)(b) and 17(7) of the FOIA.
 |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50204417.pdf
 }}
 {{DNDecision
-|1=FOI 42
+|dnd_section=FOI 17
-|2=Not upheld
+|dnd_finding=Upheld
+}}
+{{DNDecision
+|dnd_section=FOI 42
+|dnd_finding=Not upheld
 }}