FS50203058: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
(XML import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50203058
|dn_ref=FS50203058
|dn_date=21/12/2009
|dn_date=21/12/2009
|dn_pa=Office of Communications
|dn_pa=Office of Communications
|dn_summary=The complainant made a series of requests to Ofcom regarding the number of complaints received from viewers/listeners that were deemed not to have broken any broadcasting code and which on review, were subsequently overturned. Ofcom refused the request on cost grounds under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (�the Act�). The Commissioner finds that section 12(1) has been applied correctly. He has also recorded a number of procedural breaches.
|dn_summary=“the Act”). The Commissioner finds that section 12(1) has been applied correctly. He has also recorded a number of procedural breaches.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50203058.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50203058.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 17
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 16
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:23, 3 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50203058
  • Date: 21/12/2009
  • Public Authority: Office of Communications
  • Summary: “the Act”). The Commissioner finds that section 12(1) has been applied correctly. He has also recorded a number of procedural breaches.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]