FS50193290: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50193290 | |dn_ref=FS50193290 | ||
|dn_date=10 | |dn_date=10 November 2009 | ||
|dn_pa=Home Office | |dn_pa=Home Office | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of the test report which relates to a specific type of speed camera which was compiled as part of the Type Approval process. The Home Office claimed that the report was exempt from disclosure on the basis that it was provided in confidence (section 41) and that disclosure would be likely to prejudice commercial interests (section 43). The Commissioner has determined that the Home Office was correct to cite section 41 and orders no steps to be taken. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested a copy of the test report which relates to a specific type of speed camera which was compiled as part of the Type Approval process. The Home Office claimed that the report was exempt from disclosure on the basis that it was provided in confidence (section 41) and that disclosure would be likely to prejudice commercial interests (section 43). The Commissioner has determined that the Home Office was correct to cite section 41 and orders no steps to be taken. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50193290.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50193290.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision1 | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 41 | |dnd_section=FOI 41 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:30, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50193290
- Date: 10 November 2009
- Public Authority: Home Office
- Summary: The complainant requested a copy of the test report which relates to a specific type of speed camera which was compiled as part of the Type Approval process. The Home Office claimed that the report was exempt from disclosure on the basis that it was provided in confidence (section 41) and that disclosure would be likely to prejudice commercial interests (section 43). The Commissioner has determined that the Home Office was correct to cite section 41 and orders no steps to be taken.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
