FS50190517: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision3" to "DNDecision") |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{DNDecision | ||
|dnd_section=FOI 40 | |dnd_section=FOI 40 | ||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |dnd_finding=Not upheld | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 22:58, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50190517
- Date: 9 September 2009
- Public Authority: Liverpool City Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information from Liverpool City Council regarding the departure of Robyn Archer. The Council refused to disclose the requested information under sections 40(2), 41 and 43 of the Act. The Commissioner has investigated and found that the Council breached the requirements of sections 1(1), 17(1) and 10(1) of the Act. However, he found that the requested information is exempt by virtue of section 40(2) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions