FS50175541: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50175541 | |dn_ref=FS50175541 | ||
|dn_date=18/12/2008 | |dn_date=18/12/2008 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 12 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 16 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 3 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50175541
- Date: 18/12/2008
- Public Authority: Ministry of Justice
- Summary: The complainant made two requests for information to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). The first request was refused under section 12 of the Act as the MoJ stated that to locate the information held would exceed the appropriate cost limit. The MoJ informed the complainant that the information requested in the second request was not held. The Commissioner has investigated and finds that section 12(1) is engaged as he agrees that to provide the information in the first request would exceed the appropriate cost limit. He also finds that the information requested in the second part of the second request is not held. However the Commissioner also finds that the MoJ breached the requirements of sections 1(1) (a), 1(1) (b) and 10(1) of the Act.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 16 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
