FS50167292: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50167292 | |dn_ref=FS50167292 | ||
|dn_date=27 | |dn_date=27 May 2008 | ||
|dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs | |dn_pa=Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs | ||
|dn_summary= the exception in Regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applied. The Commissioner decided that the public authority’s response was reasonable, but that it had failed to issue its decision within the time limit set out in Regulation 5(2) of the EIR. | |dn_summary=The complainant asked the public authority for the size, exact position and date of ‘restriction’ of particular plots of ‘restricted’ land. The public authority’s response was made under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (‘EIR’). It stated that it had addressed part of the request on a previous occasion, and since it did not hold the requested information the exception in Regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applied. The Commissioner decided that the public authority’s response was reasonable, but that it had failed to issue its decision within the time limit set out in Regulation 5(2) of the EIR. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50167292.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50167292.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:35, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50167292
- Date: 27 May 2008
- Public Authority: Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
- Summary: The complainant asked the public authority for the size, exact position and date of ‘restriction’ of particular plots of ‘restricted’ land. The public authority’s response was made under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (‘EIR’). It stated that it had addressed part of the request on a previous occasion, and since it did not hold the requested information the exception in Regulation 12(4)(a) of the EIR applied. The Commissioner decided that the public authority’s response was reasonable, but that it had failed to issue its decision within the time limit set out in Regulation 5(2) of the EIR.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 5 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: EIR 12 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
