FS50165274: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(CSV import)
 
m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision")
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50165274
|dn_ref=FS50165274
|dn_date=18/05/2009
|dn_date=18 May 2009
|dn_pa=Buckinghamshire County Council
|dn_pa=Buckinghamshire County Council
|dn_summary=The complainants requested statistical information about the operation of the 11+ system in Buckinghamshire schools. The Council provided some information but refused to provide certain other information on cost grounds (an implicit reference to section 12). It also refused other information on the grounds that it was third party personal information, the release of which would contravene the Data Protection Act (the exemption under section 40(2) of the Act, although not specifically cited by the Council). The Commissioner decided that the Council was entitled to rely on section 12 to withhold the requested information. However, he found that the Council was incorrect to rely on section 40(2) and had committed a number of procedural errors, and was in breach of sections 1(1)(b), 10(1), and 17(1),(5) and (7) of the Act.
|dn_summary=The complainants requested statistical information about the operation of the 11+ system in Buckinghamshire schools. The Council provided some information but refused to provide certain other information on cost grounds (an implicit reference to section 12). It also refused other information on the grounds that it was third party personal information, the release of which would contravene the Data Protection Act (the exemption under section 40(2) of the Act, although not specifically cited by the Council). The Commissioner decided that the Council was entitled to rely on section 12 to withhold the requested information. However, he found that the Council was incorrect to rely on section 40(2) and had committed a number of procedural errors, and was in breach of sections 1(1)(b), 10(1), and 17(1),(5) and (7) of the Act.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision
|1=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 10
|2=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 17
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 12
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
{{DNDecision
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 22:33, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50165274
  • Date: 18 May 2009
  • Public Authority: Buckinghamshire County Council
  • Summary: The complainants requested statistical information about the operation of the 11+ system in Buckinghamshire schools. The Council provided some information but refused to provide certain other information on cost grounds (an implicit reference to section 12). It also refused other information on the grounds that it was third party personal information, the release of which would contravene the Data Protection Act (the exemption under section 40(2) of the Act, although not specifically cited by the Council). The Commissioner decided that the Council was entitled to rely on section 12 to withhold the requested information. However, he found that the Council was incorrect to rely on section 40(2) and had committed a number of procedural errors, and was in breach of sections 1(1)(b), 10(1), and 17(1),(5) and (7) of the Act.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]