FS50150310: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (CSV import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | {{DNSummaryBox | ||
|dn_ref=FS50150310 | |dn_ref=FS50150310 | ||
|dn_date=27 | |dn_date=27 January 2010 | ||
|dn_pa=Department of Health | |dn_pa=Department of Health | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant sought correspondence exchanged between the public authority and The Prince of Wales concerning the regulation of homeopathic or herbal medicines. The public authority refused to confirm or deny whether it held any information citing section 37(2) of the Act. The complainant also sought correspondence exchanged between the public authority and His Royal | |dn_summary=The complainant sought correspondence exchanged between the public authority and The Prince of Wales concerning the regulation of homeopathic or herbal medicines. The public authority refused to confirm or deny whether it held any information citing section 37(2) of the Act. The complainant also sought correspondence exchanged between the public authority and His Royal Highness’ Foundation for Integrated Health, again concerning the regulation of homeopathic or herbal medicines. The public authority informed the complainant that it did not hold any such correspondence. The complainant disputed the basis upon which the public authority refused both of his requests. The Commissioner has concluded that the public authority was entitled to refuse to confirm or deny whether it held information falling within the scope of the first request and further is satisfied that the public authority does not hold any information falling within the scope of the complainant’s second request. | ||
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/fs_50150310.pdf | |dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/fs_50150310.pdf | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{DNDecision | {{DNDecision | ||
| | |dnd_section=FOI 10 | ||
| | |dnd_finding=Upheld | ||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 17 | |||
|dnd_finding=Upheld | |||
}} | |||
{{DNDecision | |||
|dnd_section=FOI 37 | |||
|dnd_finding=Not upheld | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:31, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50150310
- Date: 27 January 2010
- Public Authority: Department of Health
- Summary: The complainant sought correspondence exchanged between the public authority and The Prince of Wales concerning the regulation of homeopathic or herbal medicines. The public authority refused to confirm or deny whether it held any information citing section 37(2) of the Act. The complainant also sought correspondence exchanged between the public authority and His Royal Highness’ Foundation for Integrated Health, again concerning the regulation of homeopathic or herbal medicines. The public authority informed the complainant that it did not hold any such correspondence. The complainant disputed the basis upon which the public authority refused both of his requests. The Commissioner has concluded that the public authority was entitled to refuse to confirm or deny whether it held information falling within the scope of the first request and further is satisfied that the public authority does not hold any information falling within the scope of the complainant’s second request.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld - Find other matching decisions
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 37 - Complaint Not upheld - Find other matching decisions
