FS50147679: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50147679
|dn_ref=FS50147679
|dn_date=14/07/2008
|dn_date=14 July 2008
|dn_pa=Foreign and Commonwealth Office
|dn_pa=Foreign and Commonwealth Office
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the business affairs of David Mills, the husband of Tessa Jowell MP. While the Commissioner found that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) did not hold the information, he criticised FCO for leading the complainant to believe that it did. The Commissioner concluded that FCO had breached section 10 of the Act in failing to respond to the information request within 20 working days.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information relating to the business affairs of David Mills, the husband of Tessa Jowell MP. While the Commissioner found that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) did not hold the information, he criticised FCO for leading the complainant to believe that it did. The Commissioner concluded that FCO had breached section 10 of the Act in failing to respond to the information request within 20 working days.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50147679.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2008/fs_50147679.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 1(1)(a)
|dnd_section=FOI 1(1)(a)
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision2
|dnd_section=FOI 10(1)
|dnd_section=FOI 10(1)
|dnd_finding=Upheld
|dnd_finding=Upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:27, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50147679
  • Date: 14 July 2008
  • Public Authority: Foreign and Commonwealth Office
  • Summary: The complainant requested information relating to the business affairs of David Mills, the husband of Tessa Jowell MP. While the Commissioner found that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) did not hold the information, he criticised FCO for leading the complainant to believe that it did. The Commissioner concluded that FCO had breached section 10 of the Act in failing to respond to the information request within 20 working days.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1 Template:DNDecision2