FS50146608: Difference between revisions

From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(XML import)
(CSV import)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DNSummaryBox
{{DNSummaryBox
|dn_ref=FS50146608
|dn_ref=FS50146608
|dn_date=27/07/2009
|dn_date=27 July 2009
|dn_pa=Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
|dn_pa=Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
|dn_summary=ved was exempt. The Commissioner has decided that section 40(2) is engaged in relation to all of the withheld information.
|dn_summary=The complainant requested a management investigation report and supporting documents, undertaken in response to allegations made by a whistleblower into the care practices at one of the authority’s children’s homes. Wakefield Metropolitan District Council refused to supply the reports claiming reliance on section 40(2), 30(2) and in the alternative 31(1). When reviewing its decision, the Council agreed to release some sections of the reports after redaction of information it still believed was exempt. The Commissioner has decided that section 40(2) is engaged in relation to all of the withheld information.
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50146608.pdf
|dn_url=http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50146608.pdf
}}
}}
{{DNDecision
{{DNDecision1
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_section=FOI 40
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
|dnd_finding=Not upheld
}}
}}

Revision as of 22:27, 15 May 2010


Decision Summary

  • Case Ref: FS50146608
  • Date: 27 July 2009
  • Public Authority: Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
  • Summary: The complainant requested a management investigation report and supporting documents, undertaken in response to allegations made by a whistleblower into the care practices at one of the authority’s children’s homes. Wakefield Metropolitan District Council refused to supply the reports claiming reliance on section 40(2), 30(2) and in the alternative 31(1). When reviewing its decision, the Council agreed to release some sections of the reports after redaction of information it still believed was exempt. The Commissioner has decided that section 40(2) is engaged in relation to all of the withheld information.
  • View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]

Template:DNDecision1