FS50132169: Difference between revisions
From FOIwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alex skene (talk | contribs) (XML import) |
Alex skene (talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "DNDecision1" to "DNDecision") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DNSummaryBox | |||
|dn_ref=FS50132169 | |dn_ref=FS50132169 | ||
|dn_date=26 | |dn_date=26 July 2007 | ||
|dn_pa=City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council | |dn_pa=City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council | ||
|dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (the Council) relating to a consultation exercise it had carried out on the structure of parish councils. The Council supplied some of the information requested however withheld some of it on the grounds that the section 40 (personal information) exemption applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply section 40 to some parts of the withheld information, but not to others. As the Council has now provided the complainant with all of the information to which the Commissioner believes he is entitled, it is not required to take any further steps in respect of this complaint. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the appeal was dismissed. | |dn_summary=The complainant requested information from the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (the Council) relating to a consultation exercise it had carried out on the structure of parish councils. The Council supplied some of the information requested however withheld some of it on the grounds that the section 40 (personal information) exemption applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply section 40 to some parts of the withheld information, but not to others. As the Council has now provided the complainant with all of the information to which the Commissioner believes he is entitled, it is not required to take any further steps in respect of this complaint. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the appeal was dismissed. | ||
Latest revision as of 23:29, 15 May 2010
Decision Summary
- Case Ref: FS50132169
- Date: 26 July 2007
- Public Authority: City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
- Summary: The complainant requested information from the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (the Council) relating to a consultation exercise it had carried out on the structure of parish councils. The Council supplied some of the information requested however withheld some of it on the grounds that the section 40 (personal information) exemption applied. The Commissioner has decided that the Council was correct to apply section 40 to some parts of the withheld information, but not to others. As the Council has now provided the complainant with all of the information to which the Commissioner believes he is entitled, it is not required to take any further steps in respect of this complaint. An appeal was made to the Information Tribunal, but the appeal was dismissed.
- View PDF of Decision Notice: [1]
- Section of Act / Finding: FOI 40 - Complaint Partly Upheld - Find other matching decisions
